Medicare and Medicaid
Our work in Medicare and Medicaid
-
CMS’ Positive Step on Site-Neutral Payments and the Case for Going Further
The authors argue that site-neutral payment under the CMS proposed rule should ultimately be applied to a much broader set of clinical services.
Categorized in -
Does Spending More Get More? Health Care Delivery and Fiscal Implications From a Medicare Fee Bump
Chen and her colleagues assess the effects of a Medicare temporary 10 percent fee bump for primary care visits on service volume, physician labor supply, and quality of care in the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
Categorized in -
Medicare’s ‘Catastrophic Insurance’ Can Be a Catastrophe for Middle-Income Seniors
Even with Medicare’s catastrophic insurance, middle-income seniors can be on the hook for thousands of dollars for their medications each year, write Erin Trish and Geoffrey Joyce in STAT.
Categorized in -
Seminar Series: Tim Layton
Timothy Layton is an assistant professor of health care policy at Harvard. His research focuses on the economics of health insurance markets with an emphasis on understanding insurer behavior and designing optimal health plan payment systems.
-
Can MIPS Be Salvaged?
The goal of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, or MIPS, was to encourage clinicians to deliver more efficient, higher-quality care, but many observers have raised concerns that MIPS will fail.
Categorized in -
Growing Number of Unsubsidized Part D Beneficiaries with Catastrophic Spending Suggests Need for Out-Of-Pocket Cap
More than one million Part D enrollees who were not eligible for cost assistance reached the catastrophic coverage in 2015.
Categorized in -
Without a Cap, Out-of-Pocket Drug Spending Poses Great Risk
Medicare Part D distinctly lacks a cap on out-of-pocket spending, sending many beneficiaries toward financial hazard.
Categorized in -
Will California Be Ready? Implementing Programs for Serious Illness
National and state experts examined California’s readiness to meet the needs of patients with serious illness going forward and trends in this population.
Categorized in -
Improving Bundled Payments in the Medicare Program
John Romley and Paul Ginsburg look at three ways to improve the effectiveness of bundled payment systems.
Categorized in -
The Case for Reforming Competitive Bidding in Medicare Advantage
Schaeffer Initiative experts propose reforming the way that fixed monthly payments to MA plans are determined, replacing the current, overly complex structure with one that would enhance competition, simplify beneficiary choice through standardization, and save an estimated $10 billion annually.
Categorized in