News
 
 
 
     
    Medication Adherence Can Be a Good Measure of Health Plan Quality, AJMC Study Finds

    7/21/2015


    The link between getting patients to take medication correctly and keeping down healthcare costs is strong enough that adherence is being tied to reimbursement for healthcare providers. A study by Schaeffer Center Researchers Seth Seabury, Darius Lakdawalla and Dana Goldman published this month in The American Journal of Managed Care examines connections at the health plan level between good plan-level adherence, lower rates of disease complications, and lower medical spending.

    By: Mary Caffrey, AJMC

     Health plans whose patients with diabetes and congestive heart failure (CHF) took medication regularly had lower rates of complications from those diseases, which suggests that measuring medication adherence might be a way to rate plan performance, according to a study just published by The American Journal of Managed Care. The full study can be found here.

    The study, led by Seth A Seabury, PhD, fellow at the USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics and Associate Professor of Emergency Research Medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC analyzed medical and pharmacy claims from a database of large private employers for the period 2000 to 2009. The data included care received in both inpatient and outpatients settings and featured pharmacy claims and drug identifiers, including the number of days of medication supplied. Researchers identified patients who were prescribed drugs for diabetes or CHF and who took their medication at least 80 percent of the time, a standard for good adherence from the National Quality Forum recognized by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and many other payers.
    Then, researchers compared those findings against patient outcomes, using quality measures for preventable conditions and episodes in both diabetes and CHF; these included inpatient admissions and rates of both short-term and long-term complications.

    Adherence varied across the plans. Of note, the data showed patients with these chronic conditions are taking medication only about half the time: rates for common therapies in diabetes ranged from 45.2 percent for statins to 56 percent for oral antidiabetes medications; in CHF, patients took diuretics only 37 percent of the time and, and adherence for ACE inhibitors and ARBs was 51.2 percent.

    Plans with low rates of adherence to diabetes medications had adjusted rates of uncontrolled diabetes admissions of 13.2 per 1,000 patients, compared with 11.2 per 1,000 in plans with moderate adherence and 8.3 per 1,000 in plans with high adherence. Adjusted rates of CHF-related admissions were 15.3 percent in low adherence plans, 12.4 percent in moderate adherence plans, and 12.2 percent in high adherence plans.

    The effect translated into savings for plans whose patients with chronic conditions have better levels of adherence, the study found: Diabetes patients in plans with low levels of adherence accounted for $8,784 in annual medical spending on average; those in plans with moderate adherence had an average of $8,236, and those in plans with high adherence had an average of $6,766. The effect was even greater for CHF patients: those in plans with low, moderate and high levels of adherence accounted for annual medical spending levels of $31,500, $23,519, and $20,408, respectively.

    The authors do not address why some plans have better adherence than others, and they note that their findings only associate adherence with better health outcomes; they do not find a cause and effect. Still, they write, “The constellation of activities that high-adherence plans undertake to improve quality seems to produce gains in health outcomes for patients.”